Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:10
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Elden Ring Nightreign Is Getting An Official Hardcover Strategy Guide - GameSpot
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
7 Surprising Home and Garden Mistakes That Could Be Making Your Allergies Worse - Yahoo
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Used vehicle prices ease from tariff fear-buying highs but remain elevated - CNBC
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Protein Coffee Can Help You Build Muscle And Lose Weight—Here's How To Make It Taste Great - AOL.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why in my 60s do I have a strong desire to suck cock and swallow?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
GLP-1 drugs may be linked to elevated risk of serious eye disease, study finds - statnews.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear: